Видео

Kala ko may bago halos lahat nang content ay siyang binanggit sa Kriminal Series sa Rappler... parang inulit lang ung naration

Man, imagine if we're able to pull off a Shogun or even Vikings level of production value to be able to tell these historical events.

We need more studies and teach our history.

Sana ma cover din ang kasaysayan ng Ilocos bago dumating mga Kastilla. Halos hindi na babanggit ang kasaysayan ng kaharian ng Ilocos kung meron man. At kung ano ang Vigan bago naging Intramuros ng norte.

Joke

I wished this history was taught when I was growing up in the Philippines.

Makes more sense than the history books they have in the schools here in the Philippines! Now there is a possibility that our history is really twisted so that the younger generations will see their ancestors as cowards and europeans as winners, you really can't trust these western people

LALA MO BUHAY NI MALLARI ANG TOPIC BAT GEOGRAPIC CHANNEL ANG INTRO WEW

Ang bagyo ay pinapadala yan ng Panginoon Diyos nakasulat po sa biblia yan

Forts Santiago and San Antonio Abad are both star forts that the old kingdom built, not by the Spaniards

Tooo bnbg ngbg mangnggal mama ni father

wahahahhaah i said..manila is evil side🤭🤭🤭🤭

Your "Who?" chapter (5:20) of the video was essentially plagiarised from Rappler's video on Mallari. Disappointing.

Hello Kirby, I'm Jerc Cinco, actually, I was born in Quezon City, but in 1991, i'm now a resident of Aparri, Cagayan... malaki ang interes ko sa kasaysayan simula ng aking kabataan, mahilig akong magbasa ng mga libro ng kasaysayan.. since nang tumira ako dito sa Aparri, na-curious ako sa history nito, subalit kulang sa mga historical documents, na allegedly nasunog noong World War II, at iilan na lamang ang natira.... minsan may mga nakakausap akong matatanda at ibinibahagi ang kasaysayan ng bayan ayon sa kanilang point of view... Ang Aparri ay naging settlement ng mga Chinese at naging sentro ng Kalakalaang Galleon between Manila and Acapulco... maraming mga Chinese Businessman dito, dito rin ipananganak ang Ina ni Senator Sherwin Gatchalian... pero never ni my life na may nabanggit sa aking tungkol sa Japanese Settlements dito sa Aparri, nac-curious ako, 2 years ako ng mapanaood ko ang vlog ng Kings and Generals, pero it was debunked... at napunta ako Channel mo.... sa totoo lang lalo pang lumalim ang interes ko sa history ng bayan ng Aparri.. maraming salamat... I hope ma-ishare ko itong untold story na ito.. i hope baka may makausap akong mga Aparriano na may lahing Japanese hehehe

Ah ganun pala ibigsabihin ng maharlika parang gentile ang meaning kasi ang gentile ay slave pero ng dumating si Kristo ang ating Panginoon nabigyan ng kalayaan spiritual ang mga gentile

The gold of Solomon and gol of the Philippines HAS NOTHING TO DO ABOUT GOD'S PLAN OF SALVATION! May God rebuke you!!!

This is very good, but I also have some correction... 1. I don't think that Lankandula was a "king"... The title "Lakan" seems to roughly translate to "Landlord" its cognate in Javanese is "Raka" but it also appears in a Sanskritized form as "Rakarayan" and in Malay it appears as "Karayan". Lankandula owned properties on both Luzon and Brunei, his relative (brother or cousin) was the Rajah of Manila, while his nephew was the crown prince/heir apparent to the throne and his grandfather was the Rajah of Brunei (I know that people nowadays call him "Sultan" but historically the ruler of Brunei was still referred to as "Rajah" during those times)... With all of these said, Lakandula was probably more like a Duke rather than a King. 2. The term "sultan" was rarely used back then. Even the "sultans" used the title "Rajah" at the time of the arrival of the Europeans. Pigafetta on Moluccas: "*...et chiamaſſe raia ſultan Manzor" "...and he was called Rajah Sultan Mansur."* On Brunei's king: *"...Queſto re e moro et ſe chiama raia Siripada..." "That king is a Moro and his name is Raia Siripada."* \*He likely used the term "sultan" as a proper name rather than the actual title ie "rajah". They also STILL used the term "Rajah" (which was pronounced by the SEAsians/Filipinos more like "raya", "laya, or "ladya" per later Sp. dictionaries NOT "ra-ha" or "ra-zha" as we use today in Sp. and English) even on those that continued to use the native term "datu". Eg. Pigafetta on chiefs in Sangir (Sangihe/N. Moluccas): "*Queſta yſola tenne quato re raia matandatu raia lalagha Raia bapti et raia parabu ſonno gentili ſta in tre gradi et mezo a lartico et 27. legue longi de ſaranghany. et edetta ſanghir.*" English: "*That island has four kings, \[namely\],* ***Raia Matandatu***, *Raia Lalagha, Raía Bapti, and Raia Parabu. The people are heathens. The island lies at a latitude of three and one-half degrees toward the Arctic Pole and is 27 leguas from Saranghany ('Sarangani, PH'). Its name is Sanghir*." In a later PH example that was similar: "Rajah Matanda" (per accounts by the Legazpi expeditions). I spoke about the concept of "old" vs. "young" kings, which is a type of system continued from the pre-Islamic period and carried on by the later Muslim states which considered themselves "sultanates" (note at the bottom of the post). \**If tldr: pre-colonial chiefs, essentially groomed their successors (who usually were their nephews or their sons). The "old king" essentially reaches a certain age and he "semi-retire" leaving his successor to do most of the tasks of the state eg. like a vizier or prime minister + top military general, until he (the older) dies or fully abdicates at which time the "prime minister" ie "young king" becomes the senior; thus he and his successor will continue a similar cycle.* *An example of this in the PH is the relationship of Ache (ie "Raxa Matanda" ie "old Rajah") and his nephew, Sulayman ("Young Rajah"), the last kings of Manila, who were ousted from power by the Spanish. This type of system was continued on by Muslim chiefdoms ie "sultanates" like in Maguindanao, evidenced by their history and accounts of the British (read post). This type of system probably pre-dated Islamic and Hindu influence.* "Sultan" was an emerging term and had not fully displaced the term "rajah" because this time period (15th and 16th, even the 17th c.) was a transition period between Islamization of once heavily Hindic region. The earliest "sultanates" in the region that were prominent enough only emerged in the 1400s (Malay Peninsula ie Malacca sultanate), while those in Java and Sumatra only emerged after the 1520s and later (Banten and Mataram). Some of these existing "sultanates" that emerged.

muslim filipinos can divorce

Please discuss the the legitimacy of Out of Igorot Theory - as opposed to Out of Taiwan Theory

Thank you so much, as an aspiring history professor/historian, I love your contents they're factual, animated and engaging. More power po 😉

As a result of the conquest of Manila, it also emerged as the first global city as it connected Asia, Europe and Americas by trade through Manila Acapulco Galleon trade. It was the only city in Asia able to trade across the Pacific and Atlantic.

Chinatown in Manila was burnt to the ground more than once in years passed. The locals became envious jealous and murderous seeing the success of the Chinese hard work. And the locals would riot, kill and burn the place to the ground. Years afterward, people forgot, new immigrants would arrive and the whole process would repeat itself. Crazy.

Kung Hindi totoo Ang 192t Mt commission ni FPFEM ay saan galing Ang 600,000 Mt gold na nasa Central Bank sa Q.C. na Ang 3,500 Mt ay inilabas ni Pnoy n 5 more cohorts na na intercept at Ngayon ay nasa Malaysia pa ?

Medyo over simplified, may paraan ba para ipaliwanag ang political stucture, trade, industry, timeline, etc. Madaming flowery words na ginamit sa video, "spirit, identity, resilence, heritage" Ano ang examples ng precolonial traits na makikita hanggang ngayon sa Manila? Medyo broad din yung precolonial period pero parang compressed din ang presentation. Sana sinabi din sa video kung ano ang size ng Manila at kung saan ito matatagpuan, ano ang sinasakop na area ng original Manila sa current Manila, ano ang population size ng Manila. Hindi din pinaliwanag ang "wealth" ng Manila, wala naman standard currency nung panahon na yun at hindi laging gold ang basehan ng weath, natural resources. Base rin sa presentation, parang Manila lang ang gusto ng Spanish, pero ang gusto talaga nila ay ang buong Pilipinas. Manila ba ang nakikipag trade sa ibang bansa, o sila ang nakikipag trade sa Manila, may ship building industry ba ang Manila? Mga details na ganun. "Liberate the Philippines from Spanish rule" wala naman silang concept ng one nation nung panahon na yun, nahahaluan ng modern nationalism. Para sa mga Spanish, location lang ang gusto nila sa Manila, wala naman value sa kanila ang mga nakatira doon at kung anong civilization ang maabutan nila doon. Ano ba ang Manila kumpara sa Aztec at Maya civilization na pinabagsak din ng Spanish conquest.

over acting mag reaction video amp.

Aztecs & other tribes of Native American Indians are suspected to be related to ancient Austronesians. Ancient Austronesians have sailed as far as Easter Island of Pacific near Chile & Peru in Latin America, some 5,000 years ago. Filipinos are Austronesians. They could be related, that may have been separated thru time & geographical constraints. But got together again from Spanish colonization of Mexico & the Americas.

Just watched the movie and how I wish they based it on the same research you made. So much more interesting! Kudos to you!

mas okay sana kung Tagalog ito sir..

👌👌 very informative!

What I learned personally about world/philippine history in general is that over time, information is changed, modified, misinterpreted to the point of inaccuracies leading to modern fiction. In the Philippines, the only reliable, factual, concrete informations are the following: Boxer Codex illustrations, the Philippine geography, the dialects or languages, discovered artifacts, local customs/culture. Everything else we read or hear about from supposed scholars, experts, professors etc are just their own complicated over-analyzations and theories. Not everything has an answer and it’s ok to say, “I do not know.”. Just apply logic to the obvious and the likely answer is simply that. Sort of like Occam’s theory of the simplest explanation tending to be the right one rather than adding complexities to the point of basically boolshyetting. Kirby, you do very good work and I pick-up useful information here and there. But sometimes your explanations are so detailed and complex that I wonder where you get your informations. The fact that Manila was practically pulverized in WW2 it would be nearly impossible to find centuries of Philippine history since most were destroyed or burned and might I add possibly fabricated to fit the Spanish or American narratives. Don’t get me wrong, your work is fascinating but after what happened in the past decades, I have learned that events, history and facts can easily be distorted, deleted and dilated.

Something seems off. Muslims have sultans. Hindu have rajas. If the head of Manila is a raja, he's most likely not a Muslim. Otherwise, he would call himself a sultan. Muslims are very sensitive about this title game. Which is why you see sultans predominantly in Mindanao, where Muslims are well entrenched.

Diba po kasaysayan naman natin to Bakit hindi sa wikang filipino or tagalog nalang po kayo nag paliwanag ganito rin po ang sinusulong nila historyador Xiao Chua na lahat po sa tagalog dapat pinapaliwanag

When I watched the Mallari movie, secularism issue is also what I have in mind.

Taga magalang pampanga po ako

I enjoy your discussions of Philippine History.

I often comw back to find sources! This has been very welcome ^^

So this is how I got my India last name

Given that he had mental illness, 57 souls is more than enough 2 death sentences. I find it funny when the narrator said he confessed killing 57 then hinted that he was wrongly accused then proceeded to racism. Stop with these misinformations! He was mentally unstable and his deeds are irredeemable.

From Brunei, lots of Bruneians (and borneans) also wondered what happened to Maynila in 1570s. We just learnt a bit that it fell right before Spaniards tried to conquer and colonise Brunei in 1578. The fall of Maynila really affects demographics and geopolitics in the Southeast Asia region (especially in Malay world). Thank you for the video, insight and knowledge.

Sana nabuhay ako nung pre colonial era para nasulat ko Yung boung history ng pilipinas bago mga kastila😢

Imagine this being a sequel to the 1521 movie where 49 years later, another princess and spaniard fall in love but suddenly find themselves in the middle of the Battle of Manila. :P

A great video once again datu Kirby❤, I wonder if Pre-colonial Cagayan Valley was also part of the Kingdom of Lúsung?😁

I hope i can see a Filipino version of Game of Thrones centered on Manila’s fate before and after the Spanish Arrived

How you gonna Visaya undefeated when there’s hella Catholic Churches. What kind of dumb logic is that

Sir walang tallano gold marcos gold mayroon nais ninyong malaman 40 yrs laban mula swiz court hanggang ppilippine scourt research kayoPRAMS

thanks you very much kirby The Battle of Manila (1570) was fought in Manila between the native Filipinos led by Raja Soliman (III) and the Spaniards led by Martin de Goiti, Maestro de Campo on May 24, 1570. The forces under Goiti were victorious and as a result Manila became a capital of the Philippines.

Ang mga datu ay mula sa dugo ng mga datu o pinumo ng isang angkan o pamayanan o faunder ng isang pamayanan minamana ito ng mga anak.ang rajah ay pinuno din pero hindi minana.ito ay nakukuha nila sa pakikidigma at pagsisisigaan.para silang mga gang.sa mga lugar sa pilipinas.tulad ng maynila.na naging teritoryo ni solaiman.ginagalang sya dahil sa katapangan at pagkakaroon ng tagasunod.ganun din ang lakan teritoryal na pag angkin.kayat ang pinaka legal ay datu dahil sila ay galing sa saling lahi.bawat lugar ay may datu.dahil sila ang pinuno ng pamayanang hinahawakan.depende sa lawak ng kanilang lahi.kung ang isang datu ay may sampung anak yung sampung iyon ay magiging datu kapag sila ay nag buo na ng komunidad.at ang kanilang ama ay pinunong datu.

slavers everywhere they went

Spanish conquistadors are good at lying and deception.

This wouldnt have happen if the Visayans did not join the Legazpi's conquest of the archipelago.